Right to Die Legislation Cases

Right to Die Legislation CasesFermin FloresThe Declaration of Indep shutdownence gave us the freedom of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. at once there are some times when these freedoms are place into the hands of another for example a judge. A policy that brought the attention of Americans in the ripe 1900s. Various court cases have been brought about to the public of several people who were in critical causes and whitethorn not make it or could not recover, sensation of which where a man with locked-in syndrome, which paralyzed ones muscles and brainstem, wanted to end his life.The right to die is a case where one chooses to die whether they were told that they had a certain(p) amount of time left to live. Also, if they are in critical danger and someone chooses that pick for that person who cant do it themselves. Choosing when one essential die or live goes against the 14th amendment which gave every American the full and equal benefits of the laws. Having the c hoice of choosing whether someone lives or not ties in with abortion. One catch choosing over if a baby should live or not. The right to die is an issue which some still discuss today through if one has a choice or not.Society today has been leaning more towards helping those who are severely ill and cannot recover to give them the choice of ending it. okay then this was different, Americans and government did not ac accreditledge the right to die choice. The Supreme Court state that the constitution did not mentioned suicide and plenty of Americans were uncomfortable. (http//www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2014/10/right-die). At least 20% of Americans who attend church believe that one must not suffer from a serious condition with irreversible effects. The reason wherefore we think this way is because some may have experienced this first hand or have thought of the feeling of being in critical condition not being able to do almost anything without the help of a machi ne or someone else. Oregon voters passed a law in 1994 and went into effect into 1997 that gave anyone the option to end their life through medication. This was c anyed the Death-With-Dignity law which allowed mentally competent, terminally ill adults to hasten their end which later Washington and Vermont adopted. (http//www.deathwithdignity.org/access-acts)In 1983, a woman by the name of Nancy Beth Cruzan was gravely injured from an automobile accident (http//www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_88_1503). She was taken to the hospital where she had to be sustained by artificial feedings. Her parents, whom saw no other possible way of recovery for their daughter, wanted to terminate her life-support system. The hospital declined their attempt without the approval of a judge. The Missouri Supreme Court declared that there had to be clear and convincing evidence to which the patient wanted a decision like this to be made. Nancys co-workers were brought together by her parents and th ey all announced that she would not want to be sustained in a disabled condition. The Supreme Court took this as evidence and let Nancy go.Back in 1975, 21 year old Karen Ann Quinlan collapsed and fell into a coma (http//www.ncll.org/liberty-centers/center-for-life-defense/cld-articles/57-how-the-right-to-die-came-to-america) and was placed into the hospital with a ventilator. She was unable to eat nor breathe on her own to the shew where her parents wanted to remove her from the artificial life support. As a hospitals policy, they denied their request and later was taken into court which they ruled in advance of Anns parents. Karen was removed from her ventilator in 1976 but miraculously started breathing on her own again. Choosing the right to die for someone else who is in critical condition depart be difficult for the hospital and the family. In order for one to make a life or death choice for someone in critical condition, some requirements must be met The patient must no lo nger be competent to make the choice themselves, meaning they have no knowledge of whats happening. Also, the patients conditions must be that he or she cannot recover.Another case of the right to die, 57 year old capital of Minnesota Lamb was caught in a car accident 23 years ago which paralyzed him from his neck down. With the help of his daughter and the wife of a anterior paralyzed man named Tony (who fought to end his life but the court didnt allow him) Paul, followed Tonys legacy, and took his battle to the court just to end up losing on July 30th, 2013. The court did allow, however, for a third man to appeal for the right to die, but the law did not make it clear whether the doctor or nurse impart be prosecuted by the government if they helped in the procedure.In one of the most recent stark nakeds, a woman by the name of Brittany Maynard was diagnosed with brain cancer which gave her barely six months to live. She thought of ways to give herself and her family the least amount of pain possible. After researching, she found Death-with-Dignity and moved to Oregon, one of five states that allow Death-With-Dignity. (http//www.cnn.com/2014/10/07/ discernment/maynard-assisted-suicide-cancer-dignity/) Within the news, she mentioned I do not want to die. But I am dying. And I want to die on my own terms, she wanted the choice to die in peace and surrounded by her loved ones than to die in pain, alone in a hospital.One must consider how traumatic it would be to stay in the bed for the rest of their life due to a serious accident. Letting the people you love the most go with the fancy of the judge is one of the most heartbreaking event a relative can experience. In the year 1947, only 37% of the citizens felt that doctors should be lawfully permitted to end a patients life if there was no way for them to get cured. Fast forwarding 55 years later, the government placed the same poll again hoping for different results. (http//www.gallup.com/poll/6265/right- die-dead-rights.aspx) That year, in 2002, 72% of Americans now felt that doctors should help end a patients life. Without a doubt, one should cherish every single moment they spend with a certain person like as if its the last time you may see them. Whether you think nothing will happen wrong or that they are safe from any harm, live your life out. You dont know if one may get diagnosed with a serious life-threatening or get attacked until it happens.With all said, if all of the states decide to adopt the Death with Dignity law, new opportunity will be open to those who are severely ill. This can have two results, one of which will result in new arguments. It will open the gate for those with suicidal thoughts and may think they have a chance to get a law passed to allow those who feel alone to end their life. On the other hand, it gives those with severe issues to have their easy, unpainful way out.